---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Cmdrwilkens" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 03:12:53 -0400 Subject: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me for your ignorance. How did this come about you say? 1) I post a quote, to wit: (news:agdks0$l0655$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de ) --- > Most of the dozens of galaxies in our Local Group are less than 10,000 light > years in size. Canonically, all it must contain is a million stars or so > (ANH novel). Or, actually, all it must contain is a million habitable > systems. > Just for fun, ANH Novelisation\ (as stated above, same page in fact) "...which in itself represented only a tiny fraction of this section of one modest-sized galaxy." We know its not a tiny galaxy and we know it has several satellite galaxies which constrains the size into something appreciably close to our galaxy. --- 2) DarkStar posts: (news:c2jY8.101932$iX5.4692566@bin3.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com ) --- The novel also says that the empire "represented only a tiny fraction of this section of one modest-sized galaxy." --- 3) DarkStar then blames me (news:gfpY8.108275$Bt1.5651655@bin5.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com ) --- Sorry, guys. I took a quote from Cmdrwilkens and presumed it to be substantially accurate, and topical to what was being discussed. My bad - I was too trusting of the resident idiot. I assumed he could read. --- Now I want to knwo where the FUCK I said anything that says the Empire was the object which "represented only a tiny..." Frankly I've never stated ntor implied that anywhere and DarkSar that is somethign almost akin to slander so frankly I'm just plain old calling you out: stop wiht the bullshit, stop with the blaming others for your own unjustified assumptions, stop with your moral superiority act because you have none and frankly stop breathing because the world would be a much better place if arrogant assholes like yourself removed themselves from the pool of selectees for procreation. If you've got a problem with my spelling fine, I'll freely admit that I;'m probably one of the three or four worst posters in that regard period. However don't ever presume that gives you the right to slander me with false accusations and donkey shit like this. Were I a less restrained person I might chose to render in exsquisite detail the means by which I would like to contriv your painful end but I'd rather say that every post you make does only more of convincing the total populaiton viewing that you are little more than a ten thousand year backwards leap down the evolutionary ladder. Were I inclined to do so I might follow through with a FormFlame just to distance myself for the repugnant air your posts somehow manage to convey through the corridors of USENET dspite being no more than ones and zerosuntill the signal reaches me. Frankly I posted this because you need to learn some fucking manners, leanr some fucking humility, and basically sit down and shut up for the next decade while you try to become a productive member of the Animal Kingdom. -- Lcpl Burnett, G.R. USMCR BridgeCo B 6th EngSptBN 4th FSSG "Weapons do not penetrate armour based on force and pressure" - IXJac(taken from SB.com and SD.net) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "His Divine Shadow" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:36:48 +0300 Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: <03QY8.47$sn5.762@read2.inet.fi> -------- WTF do you expect? The guy is dumb as door, heck I've taken craps with more evolutionary potential than him. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Colin'The Yosemite Bear'Witz" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 01:37:08 -0700 Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "His Divine Shadow" wrote in message news:03QY8.47$sn5.762@read2.inet.fi... > WTF do you expect? The guy is dumb as door, heck I've taken craps with more > evolutionary potential than him. > > Hell in my mood I want to start religious services for Kali, just so that I can have a first amendment excuse to kill somebody, I think no one would miss him.... ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "DarkStar" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:10:18 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: <_pRY8.225504$vq.12060459@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com> -------- "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message news:ah0h27$p41f7$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me for > your ignorance. > > How did this come about you say? > > 1) I post a quote, to wit: (news:agdks0$l0655$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de ) > --- > > Most of the dozens of galaxies in our Local Group are less than 10,000 > light > > years in size. Canonically, all it must contain is a million stars or so > > (ANH novel). Or, actually, all it must contain is a million habitable > > systems. > > > > Just for fun, ANH Novelisation\ (as stated above, same page in fact) > "...which in itself represented only a tiny fraction of this section of one > modest-sized galaxy." You should have posted the entire sentence, instead of cutting out what "itself" referred to. As you can see from what you yourself quoted, we were already discussing the Empire. Your stupidity and misquotation are not my problems, fool. > Frankly I've never stated ntor implied that anywhere and DarkSar that is > somethign almost akin to slander so frankly I'm just plain old calling you > out: stop wiht the bullshit, stop with the blaming others for your own > unjustified assumptions, stop with your moral superiority act because you > have none and frankly stop breathing because the world would be a much > better place if arrogant assholes like yourself removed themselves from the > pool of selectees for procreation. Wow. One sentence, six-and-a-half lines. I'm impressed! I don't think I've ever seen you last that long! Most of your run-ons sputter and die after about three lines. I guess the ritalin is working? > zerosuntill the signal reaches me. Frankly I posted this because you need to > learn some fucking manners, leanr some fucking humility, and basically sit > down and shut up for the next decade while you try to become a productive > member of the Animal Kingdom. > > USMCR > BridgeCo B 6th EngSptBN 4th FSSG I'm going to lobby my congressman to have your pay increased so you can afford a clue. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Colin'The Yosemite Bear'Witz" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 02:19:11 -0700 Subject: Re: Dark Star, Another soul for Kali (TGODISH) Message-ID: -------- "DarkStar" wrote in message news:_pRY8.225504$vq.12060459@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > >Urk *Rummel makes neck go pop* Because you desire a burning field, the trolls have left my heart a burning field for you sweet Kali. with the quicklime prepared I buried the remains of the unfortunate Dicksore. Next on to track down every last Troll and Idiot that would menace my sense of quiet, Ando had started me down the dark path, but now the Yosemite Bear was the first of the Anti Troll Thuggee. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "DarkStar" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 09:57:48 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, Another soul for Kali (TGODISH) Message-ID: -------- "Colin'The Yosemite Bear'Witz" wrote in message news:lyRY8.42$4R7.8896613@news.inreach.com... > > "DarkStar" wrote in message > news:_pRY8.225504$vq.12060459@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > > >Urk > *Rummel makes neck go pop* > > Because you desire a burning field, the trolls have left my heart a burning > field for you sweet Kali. > > with the quicklime prepared I buried the remains of the unfortunate Dicksore. > Next on to track down every last Troll and Idiot that would menace my sense of > quiet, Ando had started me down the dark path, but now the Yosemite Bear was > the first of the Anti Troll Thuggee. No more acid for that man. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Stuart Mackey" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 23:12:53 +1200 Subject: Re: Dark Star, Another soul for Kali (TGODISH) Message-ID: -------- "DarkStar" wrote in message news:w6SY8.171876$Im2.8405960@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > "Colin'The Yosemite Bear'Witz" wrote in message > news:lyRY8.42$4R7.8896613@news.inreach.com... > > > > "DarkStar" wrote in message > > news:_pRY8.225504$vq.12060459@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > > > > >Urk > > *Rummel makes neck go pop* > > > > Because you desire a burning field, the trolls have left my heart a > burning > > field for you sweet Kali. > > > > with the quicklime prepared I buried the remains of the unfortunate > Dicksore. > > Next on to track down every last Troll and Idiot that would menace my > sense of > > quiet, Ando had started me down the dark path, but now the Yosemite Bear > was > > the first of the Anti Troll Thuggee. > > No more acid for that man. *Stamps on the back of Darkstars left knee, grabs him by the chin and pulls him off balance and throws him to the ground, proceeds to kick in his ribs* I dont use acid, and I can assure you I know how to inflict _lots_ of non fatal pain on you. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Colin'The Yosemite Bear'Witz" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:04:09 -0700 Subject: Re: Dark Star, Another soul for Kali (TGODISH) Message-ID: -------- "Stuart Mackey" wrote in message news:ah0v5k$om6n5$1@ID-75806.news.dfncis.de... > > "DarkStar" wrote in message > news:w6SY8.171876$Im2.8405960@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > > > "Colin'The Yosemite Bear'Witz" wrote in message > > news:lyRY8.42$4R7.8896613@news.inreach.com... > > > > > > "DarkStar" wrote in message > > > news:_pRY8.225504$vq.12060459@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > > > > > > >Urk > > > *Rummel makes neck go pop* > > > > > > Because you desire a burning field, the trolls have left my heart a > > burning > > > field for you sweet Kali. > > > > > > with the quicklime prepared I buried the remains of the unfortunate > > Dicksore. > > > Next on to track down every last Troll and Idiot that would menace my > > sense of > > > quiet, Ando had started me down the dark path, but now the Yosemite > Bear > > was > > > the first of the Anti Troll Thuggee. > > > > No more acid for that man. > > *Stamps on the back of Darkstars left knee, grabs him by the chin and pulls > him off balance and throws him to the ground, proceeds to kick in his ribs* > I dont use acid, and I can assure you I know how to inflict _lots_ of non > fatal pain on you. > > > (Thanks Mr. Mackey, I should have added a little note of Plonkage when I killed the Troll, as he is now dead to me....) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "d. brooks" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 16:12:47 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: <3CXY8.28186$Wt3.24579@rwcrnsc53> -------- "DarkStar" wrote... > "Cmdrwilkens" wrote... [snip] > >Sorry, guys. I took a quote from Cmdrwilkens and presumed it > > to be substantially accurate, and topical to what was being > > discussed. My bad - I was too trusting of the resident idiot. > > I assumed he could read. heehee > > Your stupidity and misquotation are not my problems, fool. LOL ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: fenix_burns@yahoo.com (Eleas) Date: 16 Jul 2002 15:57:30 -0700 Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "DarkStar" wrote in message news:<_pRY8.225504$vq.12060459@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com>... > "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message > news:ah0h27$p41f7$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > > This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me for > > your ignorance. > > > > How did this come about you say? > > > > 1) I post a quote, to wit: (news:agdks0$l0655$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de ) > > --- > > > Most of the dozens of galaxies in our Local Group are less than 10,000 > light > > > years in size. Canonically, all it must contain is a million stars or > so > > > (ANH novel). Or, actually, all it must contain is a million habitable > > > systems. > > > > > > > Just for fun, ANH Novelisation\ (as stated above, same page in fact) > > "...which in itself represented only a tiny fraction of this section of > one > > modest-sized galaxy." > > You should have posted the entire sentence, instead of cutting out what > "itself" referred to. As you can see from what you yourself quoted, we > were already discussing the Empire. Your stupidity and misquotation are not > my problems, fool. You sound like Paul, minus the intelligence. > I'm going to lobby my congressman to have your pay increased so you can > afford a clue. Scathing. Maybe you could pick up some tips from Wes on insulting people. -- Björn ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Cmdrwilkens" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 20:05:21 -0400 Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "DarkStar" wrote in message news:_pRY8.225504$vq.12060459@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message > news:ah0h27$p41f7$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > > This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me for > > your ignorance. > > > > Just for fun, ANH Novelisation\ (as stated above, same page in fact) > > "...which in itself represented only a tiny fraction of this section of > one > > modest-sized galaxy." > > You should have posted the entire sentence, instead of cutting out what > "itself" referred to. As you can see from what you yourself quoted, we > were already discussing the Empire. Your stupidity and misquotation are not > my problems, fool. DarkStar: You should have to do my research for me, you should provide every piece of data I want so that I don't have to do any work like reading Me: STFU My discussion, when I quoted that, related ONLY to the size of the SW galaxy. Take your retarded ass back to the thread and noticce that I was dealing specifically and ONLy with your assertion that the SW galaxy was a small one in comparison to ours. Only an ignorant fool of your magnitude would mistake a discussion on the size of the galaxy as a whole to a discussion on the size and scope of the Empire which we never focused on until you brought forth your ingnorant shit. Once again I am not responsible fo providing you with the entire novel only with those quotes which disprove your assertions or which support mine, in this case you asserted the SW galaxy was tiny while I pulled out a quote that dealt only with size of the galaxy and YOU, not me, assumed I was talking about something else. I've said it once I'll keep saying it: I am not responsible for idiotic assumptions YOU make because YOU are incapabale of rationaly analyzing the quote and/or researching the data fully so as to not look stupid. > > Frankly I've never stated ntor implied that anywhere and DarkSar that is > > somethign almost akin to slander so frankly I'm just plain old calling you > > out: stop wiht the bullshit, stop with the blaming others for your own > > unjustified assumptions, stop with your moral superiority act because you > > have none and frankly stop breathing because the world would be a much > > better place if arrogant assholes like yourself removed themselves from > the > > pool of selectees for procreation. > > Wow. One sentence, six-and-a-half lines. I'm impressed! I don't think > I've ever seen you last that long! Most of your run-ons sputter and die > after about three lines. I guess the ritalin is working? Ohhh you don't like my sentence structure, fuck you. As an aside I use Celexa, what's your point? Do you somehow find clinical depression funny? I've made no secret here of the fact so either you don't know me and are unintentionally trying to be a grade 1 asshole or you know and are worse yet. > > zerosuntill the signal reaches me. Frankly I posted this because you need > to > > learn some fucking manners, leanr some fucking humility, and basically sit > > down and shut up for the next decade while you try to become a productive > > member of the Animal Kingdom. > > > > USMCR > > BridgeCo B 6th EngSptBN 4th FSSG > > I'm going to lobby my congressman to have your pay increased so you can > afford a clue. My with a scathing comeback like that one I might actually stop telling you to fuck off when you blame me for your mistakes. -- Lcpl Burnett, G.R. USMCR BridgeCo B 6th EngSptBN 4th FSSG "Weapons do not penetrate armour based on force and pressure" - IXJac(taken from SB.com and SD.net) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "DarkStar" Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 07:48:34 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message news:ah2ccp$phu01$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > > You should have posted the entire sentence, instead of cutting out what > > "itself" referred to. As you can see from what you yourself quoted, we > > were already discussing the Empire. Your stupidity and misquotation are > not > > my problems, fool. > > My discussion, when I quoted that, related ONLY to the size of the SW > galaxy. Then why did you not simply quote the part where it said "modest-sized"? Why the extra crap? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Cmdrwilkens" Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 13:14:51 -0400 Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "DarkStar" wrote in message news:mj9Z8.186061$Im2.9246480@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message > news:ah2ccp$phu01$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > > > You should have posted the entire sentence, instead of cutting out what > > > "itself" referred to. As you can see from what you yourself quoted, we > > > were already discussing the Empire. Your stupidity and misquotation are > > not > > > my problems, fool. > > > > My discussion, when I quoted that, related ONLY to the size of the SW > > galaxy. > > Then why did you not simply quote the part where it said "modest-sized"? > Why the extra crap? > Because I felt like it. -- Lcpl Burnett, G.R. USMCR BridgeCo B 6th EngSptBN 4th FSSG "Weapons do not penetrate armour based on force and pressure" - IXJac(taken from SB.com and SD.net) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "DarkStar" Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:26:37 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message news:ah48nf$psb7i$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > "DarkStar" wrote in message > news:mj9Z8.186061$Im2.9246480@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > > > "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message > > news:ah2ccp$phu01$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > > > > You should have posted the entire sentence, instead of cutting out > what > > > > "itself" referred to. As you can see from what you yourself quoted, > we > > > > were already discussing the Empire. Your stupidity and misquotation > are > > > not > > > > my problems, fool. > > > > > > My discussion, when I quoted that, related ONLY to the size of the SW > > > galaxy. > > > > Then why did you not simply quote the part where it said "modest-sized"? > > Why the extra crap? > > > > Because I felt like it. I rest my case. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Cmdrwilkens" Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 01:04:33 -0400 Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "DarkStar" wrote in message news:hilZ8.192664$Im2.9697418@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message > news:ah48nf$psb7i$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > > "DarkStar" wrote in message > > news:mj9Z8.186061$Im2.9246480@bin2.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > > > > > "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message > > > news:ah2ccp$phu01$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > > > > > You should have posted the entire sentence, instead of cutting out > > what > > > > > "itself" referred to. As you can see from what you yourself > quoted, > > we > > > > > were already discussing the Empire. Your stupidity and misquotation > > are > > > > not > > > > > my problems, fool. > > > > > > > > My discussion, when I quoted that, related ONLY to the size of the SW > > > > galaxy. > > > > > > Then why did you not simply quote the part where it said "modest-sized"? > > > Why the extra crap? > > > > > > > Because I felt like it. > > I rest my case. > What, your case that I can post quotes to reply to questions in a manner I chose? yup, you've got me I quote according to the normal rules for doing so and I chose where I begin the quote, got me there such a crime on my part. I mean its horrible that I would actually make a gut call as to where to begin a quote so as to not overload the discussion with excessive data. Heaven forbid that I,in the future, refrain from quoting the entire paragraph becasuse any true English major will tell you that context can only be found in complete paragraphs if not entire chapters. Stop fingering your own ass and just admit that you made an assumption that was incorrect and which is your own fault, in other words stop blaming me for your misstep. -- Lcpl Burnett, G.R. USMCR BridgeCo B 6th EngSptBN 4th FSSG "Weapons do not penetrate armour based on force and pressure" - IXJac(taken from SB.com and SD.net) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Celes Knight" Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 01:10:59 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- > > Just for fun, ANH Novelisation\ (as stated above, same page in fact) > > "...which in itself represented only a tiny fraction of this section of > one > > modest-sized galaxy." > > You should have posted the entire sentence, instead of cutting out what > "itself" referred to. Why? It had the relevant part of sentence he was referring to--the "modest-sized galaxy" part. The "itself" part has no bearing on what he was discussing, and he did provide you with the source. You're really grasping for straws here. > As you can see from what you yourself quoted, we > were already discussing the Empire. Were you? This (below) is the message thread you're referring to, right? It doesn't appear to deal with the Empire at all. ******* Someone said: In AOTC, an Outer Rim world was shown on the map in the archives to be well inside the galaxy, near the core. The rest is assumption based on the idea they are talking about something the size of the Milky Way. Someone replied: Galactic formation requires a galaxy of such size in number of stars to be of certain sizes. additionally it is a spiral galaxy and assuming it to be similair to our own would be completely reasonable supposition without EU material (which amkes the SW galaxy larger than ours). Someone else (you?) replied: Most of the dozens of galaxies in our Local Group are less than 10,000 light years in size. Canonically, all it must contain is a million stars or so (ANH novel). Or, actually, all it must contain is a million habitable systems. Cmdrwilkens said (in responce): Just for fun, ANH Novelisation\ (as stated above, same page in fact) "...which in itself represented only a tiny fraction of this section of one modest-sized galaxy." You said (in response to Cmdrwilkens): So the Empire is a tiny fraction of a modest galaxy? ******* >Your stupidity and misquotation are not > my problems, fool. How was his statement a misquote? Are you contending that his quote did not accurately match the words and/or meaning in the book? Darkstar, I kind of want more ST supporters around, so I've practically built your argument for you. Either point out where and why Cmdrwilkens is really at fault (and no, it's not his fault that you misread him) *or* just admit that you made a mistake. It's OK, we've all made mistakes at various point. If you can't do either, than you are truly nothing but a troll. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "DarkStar" Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 08:10:23 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "Celes Knight" wrote in message news:Du3Z8.138426$Bt1.7348251@bin5.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > > Just for fun, ANH Novelisation\ (as stated above, same page in fact) > > > "...which in itself represented only a tiny fraction of this section of > > one > > > modest-sized galaxy." > > > > You should have posted the entire sentence, instead of cutting out what > > "itself" referred to. > > Why? It had the relevant part of sentence he was referring to--the > "modest-sized galaxy" part. The "itself" part has no bearing on what he was > discussing, and he did provide you with the source. You're really grasping > for straws here. > > > As you can see from what you yourself quoted, we > > were already discussing the Empire. > > Were you? This (below) is the message thread you're referring to, right? > It doesn't appear to deal with the Empire at all. > > ******* > Someone said: > In AOTC, an Outer Rim world was shown on the map in the archives to be well > inside the galaxy, near the core. The rest is assumption based on > the idea they are talking about something the size of the Milky Way. > > Someone replied: > Galactic formation requires a galaxy of such size in number of stars to be > of certain sizes. additionally it is a spiral galaxy and assuming it > to be similair to our own would be completely reasonable supposition without > EU material (which amkes the SW galaxy larger than ours). > > Someone else (you?) replied: > Most of the dozens of galaxies in our Local Group are less than 10,000 light > years in size. Canonically, all it must contain is a million stars or so > (ANH novel). Or, actually, all it must contain is a million habitable > systems. > > Cmdrwilkens said (in responce): > Just for fun, ANH Novelisation\ (as stated above, same page in fact) > "...which in itself represented only a tiny fraction of this section of one > modest-sized galaxy." > > You said (in response to Cmdrwilkens): > So the Empire is a tiny fraction of a modest galaxy? And he never replied, nor did he elaborate on what he was referring to. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Celes Knight" Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2002 21:43:11 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- > And he never replied, nor did he elaborate on what he was referring to. So you're saying that by -not- responding to your wacky notion, he was actually confirming/agreeing with everything you said? Hmmmm.... You didn't respond to these parts of my message: "It had the relevant part of sentence he was referring to--the "modest-sized galaxy" part. The "itself" part has no bearing on what he was discussing, and he did provide you with the source. " Therefore, by your own logic, you're agreeing with me. You agree that Cmdrs quote was OK. Moreover, over the years, I've made hundreds of posts on how SW would win. Yet you've never responded to a one of them. I guess that you must agree with all of them then. :-P ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "DarkStar" Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 11:14:38 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "Celes Knight" wrote in message news:PDGZ8.161421$Bt1.8841056@bin5.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > And he never replied, nor did he elaborate on what he was referring to. > > So you're saying that by -not- responding to your wacky notion, he was > actually confirming/agreeing with everything you said? > > Hmmmm.... > > You didn't respond to these parts of my message: > "It had the relevant part of sentence he was referring to--the > "modest-sized galaxy" part. The "itself" part has no bearing on what he was > discussing, and he did provide you with the source. " > > Therefore, by your own logic, you're agreeing with me. No, because I replied to the message. He did not even do that. There's a difference between cutting out irrelevant crap and utterly failing to reply in order to change someone's notions. You'll note that my reply covered the irrelevant crap I snipped. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Cmdrwilkens" Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 12:12:59 -0400 Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "DarkStar" wrote in message news:ywSZ8.263725$vq.14609819@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > "Celes Knight" wrote in > message news:PDGZ8.161421$Bt1.8841056@bin5.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com... > > > And he never replied, nor did he elaborate on what he was referring to. > > > > So you're saying that by -not- responding to your wacky notion, he was > > actually confirming/agreeing with everything you said? > > > > Hmmmm.... > > > > You didn't respond to these parts of my message: > > "It had the relevant part of sentence he was referring to--the > > "modest-sized galaxy" part. The "itself" part has no bearing on what he > was > > discussing, and he did provide you with the source. " > > > > Therefore, by your own logic, you're agreeing with me. > > No, because I replied to the message. He did not even do that. There's a > difference between cutting out irrelevant crap and utterly failing to reply > in order to change someone's notions. You'll note that my reply covered > the irrelevant crap I snipped. > Then deal with his assertion that under your theory, failure to respond is admission of correctness, SW doesn't win as Celes has made this claim many times and you have ailed to respond. moreso I do not recall the location of this particular post but my newsreader has had enough problems lately (line 3 errors mostly) which has prevented me from responding to certian sub-threads...this might be one of them. -- Lcpl Burnett, G.R. USMCR BridgeCo B 6th EngSptBN 4th FSSG "Weapons do not penetrate armour based on force and pressure" - IXJac(taken from SB.com and SD.net) "I'm a genocidal maniac, hold me." -Anakin Vader ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Celes Knight" Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2002 22:33:33 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: <1t0_8.275159$vq.15031818@bin6.nnrp.aus1.giganews.com> -------- > > Therefore, by your own logic, you're agreeing with me. > > No, because I replied to the message. He did not even do that. There's > a difference between cutting out irrelevant crap "Look straws! Quick, grasp 'em" I had made a much larger and more detailed response, covering all the internal inconsistencies and fallacies in your argument, but then I thought "why?" Other people or myself have told you them all before, and since you never replied, obviously you already agree with them. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Stuart Mackey" Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 23:07:54 +1200 Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "Cmdrwilkens" wrote in message news:ah0h27$p41f7$1@ID-97732.news.dfncis.de... > This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me for > your ignorance. Snip You need to submit this for the insults section of the fuq. Oh yeah, I agree with you 100% ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: setesh@aol.com (Setesh) Date: 16 Jul 2002 20:14:52 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: <20020716161452.02188.00000725@mb-fs.aol.com> -------- >> This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me for >> your ignorance. > >Snip > >You need to submit this for the insults section of the fuq. > Oh yeah, I agree with you 100% well duh, some of Darkstars posts are bizarre, his complete inability to understand a simple statment is staggering. I've had to puzzle over some of it trying to figure out how the hell he got to that point. Like dicussng trek ships that were destroyed or nearly so through a total system failure in their computer systems. He comes back with, So every ship that is destroyed suffers total system failure, thats a stupid definition. I had to stop and wonder how the hell he got to that. He made a leap from ships destroyed by their own crappy tech to every ship that blows up, the level of stupidity required is staggering, even TJ wouldn't have tried that. Skywarp:"Starscream, What's Megatron's plan this time? Starscream:"Who cares? You just Know it's going to be evil. And evil is always fun." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Stuart Mackey" Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 18:31:30 +1200 Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "Setesh" wrote in message news:20020716161452.02188.00000725@mb-fs.aol.com... > >> This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me for > >> your ignorance. > > > >Snip > > > >You need to submit this for the insults section of the fuq. > > Oh yeah, I agree with you 100% > > well duh, some of Darkstars posts are bizarre, his complete inability to > understand a simple statment is staggering. I've had to puzzle over some of it > trying to figure out how the hell he got to that point. Like dicussng trek > ships that were destroyed or nearly so through a total system failure in their > computer systems. He comes back with, So every ship that is destroyed suffers > total system failure, thats a stupid definition. I had to stop and wonder how > the hell he got to that. He made a leap from ships destroyed by their own > crappy tech to every ship that blows up, the level of stupidity required is > staggering, even TJ wouldn't have tried that. Yup, I agree with that too. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "DarkStar" Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 08:11:25 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "Setesh" wrote in message news:20020716161452.02188.00000725@mb-fs.aol.com... > >> This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me for > >> your ignorance. > > > >Snip > > > >You need to submit this for the insults section of the fuq. > > Oh yeah, I agree with you 100% > > well duh, some of Darkstars posts are bizarre, his complete inability to > understand a simple statment is staggering. I've had to puzzle over some of it > trying to figure out how the hell he got to that point. Like dicussng trek > ships that were destroyed or nearly so through a total system failure in their > computer systems. He comes back with, So every ship that is destroyed suffers > total system failure, thats a stupid definition. I had to stop and wonder how > the hell he got to that. He made a leap from ships destroyed by their own > crappy tech to every ship that blows up, the level of stupidity required is > staggering, even TJ wouldn't have tried that. Pointing out the fundamental flaw in your thinking is not misunderstanding. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: setesh@aol.com (Setesh) Date: 17 Jul 2002 20:19:05 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: <20020717161905.10380.00000112@mb-bg.aol.com> -------- >"Setesh" wrote in message >news:20020716161452.02188.00000725@mb-fs.aol.com... >> >> This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me >for >> >> your ignorance. >> > >> >Snip >> > >> >You need to submit this for the insults section of the fuq. >> > Oh yeah, I agree with you 100% >> >> well duh, some of Darkstars posts are bizarre, his complete inability to >> understand a simple statment is staggering. I've had to puzzle over some >of it >> trying to figure out how the hell he got to that point. Like dicussng >trek >> ships that were destroyed or nearly so through a total system failure in >their >> computer systems. He comes back with, So every ship that is destroyed >suffers >> total system failure, thats a stupid definition. I had to stop and wonder >how >> the hell he got to that. He made a leap from ships destroyed by their own >> crappy tech to every ship that blows up, the level of stupidity required >is >> staggering, even TJ wouldn't have tried that. > >Pointing out the fundamental flaw in your thinking is not misunderstanding. > > Excuse me but since when has taking a statment completely out of context of the discusion been pointing out a flaw, we were dicussing a ship that blew itself up because of and the twice near destruction of the Ent-D due to total system failure ie their computer and you went and made the leap to every ship that has blown up. Which one of us is being delusional here. Skywarp:"Starscream, What's Megatron's plan this time? Starscream:"Who cares? You just Know it's going to be evil. And evil is always fun." ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "DarkStar" Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2002 21:28:40 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: -------- "Setesh" wrote in message news:20020717161905.10380.00000112@mb-bg.aol.com... > >"Setesh" wrote in message > >news:20020716161452.02188.00000725@mb-fs.aol.com... > >> >> This is an official fuck you thread, this is fuck you for blaming me > >for > >> >> your ignorance. > >> > > >> >Snip > >> > > >> >You need to submit this for the insults section of the fuq. > >> > Oh yeah, I agree with you 100% > >> > >> well duh, some of Darkstars posts are bizarre, his complete inability to > >> understand a simple statment is staggering. I've had to puzzle over some > >of it > >> trying to figure out how the hell he got to that point. Like dicussng > >trek > >> ships that were destroyed or nearly so through a total system failure in > >their > >> computer systems. He comes back with, So every ship that is destroyed > >suffers > >> total system failure, thats a stupid definition. I had to stop and wonder > >how > >> the hell he got to that. He made a leap from ships destroyed by their own > >> crappy tech to every ship that blows up, the level of stupidity required > >is > >> staggering, even TJ wouldn't have tried that. > > > >Pointing out the fundamental flaw in your thinking is not misunderstanding. > > > > > Excuse me but since when has taking a statment completely out of context of the > discusion been pointing out a flaw A vessel was destroyed due to outside influence. You claim this represents starship system failure. A spread of torpedoes is also an outside influence. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: setesh@aol.com (Setesh) Date: 18 Jul 2002 05:32:41 GMT Subject: Re: Dark Star, here's another top level thread for you Message-ID: <20020718013241.12948.00000930@mb-me.aol.com> -------- >A vessel was destroyed due to outside influence. You claim this represents >starship system failure. > >A spread of torpedoes is also an outside influence. > > An out side influence in both of my cases, in both cases if their computers and power system were designed to TODAYS engineering safty regs with Star Trek tech, the ships Warp cores would have ejected, not gone boom taking the ship with it. Torpedoes are someone else providing the boom. Skywarp:"Starscream, What's Megatron's plan this time? Starscream:"Who cares? You just Know it's going to be evil. And evil is always fun."