---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Chuck, Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01" Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 02:18:56 GMT Subject: And Now For Something Completely Different Message-ID: -------- Robert Scott Anderson In Action > Sorry Dorkstar, you can't get 120 km from the movie. Incorrect. > No, it's the entire basis for your argument, because without it, there > is no need for your extra complexity. Incorrect. > Your explanation does not deal with the fact that this occurs in the > evidence. False. > Your position is /directly/ contradicted by at least two of the quotes which > yu have provided to support it. Not at all. > Yes, there is, because otherwise your theory does not match the canon > film. Incorrect. > Hasn't it struck you yet that about 2(possibly just one) people on 3 forums > out of many dozens, many trekkies, fivers and so on, all disagree with you? False > And since you snipped my reason for calling the defence systems shields, > you must not be able to counter it. Incorrect. > Your theory is based on your need to drop SW firepower, nothing more. Lie. > If you accept it then you ALSO accept the EU material it is generated with Incorrect. "[T]he fact remains that a simplistic, pleasant fiction can be stated very quickly and easily"-Robert Scott Anderson ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "C.S.Strowbridge" Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 04:11:31 GMT Subject: Re: And Now For Something Completely Different Message-ID: <3DB0DB9B.6090202@shaw.ca> -------- Chuck, Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01 wrote: > "[T]he fact remains that a simplistic, pleasant fiction can be stated very > quickly and easily"-Robert Scott Anderson Perfect. Absolutely perfect. Too bad it will have no effect on him. However, it should still be in the FUQ for all to see. And this post should also be in the FUQ, cause my name isn't being mentioned enough. Did you know the name Strowbridge is only mentioned in a little more than 50,000 usenet messages? It's a fucking crime. C.S.Strowbridge ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "DarkStar" Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 03:15:54 -0500 Subject: Re: And Now For Something Completely Different Message-ID: <7JWcnfunQuRWjiygXTWcpQ@comcast.com> -------- "Chuck, Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01" wrote in message news:ki3s9.78603$om2.1410687@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > Incorrect. > > Incorrect. > > False. > > Not at all. > > Incorrect. > > False > > Incorrect. > > Lie. > > Incorrect. > When the idiots and their idiotic claims I responded to in such a manner become more worthy of my time, they will receive more detailed explanations of why they are wrong. However, given the multiple prior disproofs of their claims, mixed with the multiple repetitions of those claims by the aforementioned idiots, the above is more than was required. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Stuart Mackey" Date: Sun, 20 Oct 2002 01:16:00 +1300 Subject: Re: And Now For Something Completely Different Message-ID: -------- snip > > > > When the idiots and their idiotic claims I responded to in such a manner > become more worthy of my time, they will receive more detailed explanations > of why they are wrong. Or, more to the point, you just couldnt move beyoned your own railroaded thought pattern and pre programmed responces. However, given the multiple prior disproofs of their > claims, mixed with the multiple repetitions of those claims by the > aforementioned idiots, the above is more than was required. Either that or you are too closed minded to think beyoned your own wee world to see other possibilities. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: "Greg Burnett" Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2002 14:04:23 -0400 Subject: Re: And Now For Something Completely Different Message-ID: -------- "DarkStar" wrote in message news:7JWcnfunQuRWjiygXTWcpQ@comcast.com... > > "Chuck, Tertiary Adjunct of Unimatrix 01" wrote in > message news:ki3s9.78603$om2.1410687@twister.rdc-kc.rr.com... > > > Incorrect. > > > > Incorrect. > > > > False. > > > > Not at all. > > > > Incorrect. > > > > False > > > > Incorrect. > > > > Lie. > > > > Incorrect. > > > > When the idiots and their idiotic claims I responded to in such a manner > become more worthy of my time, they will receive more detailed explanations > of why they are wrong. However, given the multiple prior disproofs of their > claims, mixed with the multiple repetitions of those claims by the > aforementioned idiots, the above is more than was required. > Wow its Wes Hutching part Deux...the incredible "I've already proved my point" complex. -- Lcpl Burnett, G.R. USMCR BridgeCo B 6th EngSptBN 4th FSSG "Weapons do not penetrate armour based on force and pressure" - IXJac(taken from SB.com and SD.net) "I'm a genocidal maniac, hold me." -Anakin Vader ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: big_red901@hotmail.com (CaptainSheridan) Date: 19 Oct 2002 11:11:01 -0700 Subject: Re: And Now For Something Completely Different Message-ID: <2d3e5dbf.0210191011.29e21a59@posting.google.com> -------- "DarkStar" wrote in message news:<7JWcnfunQuRWjiygXTWcpQ@comcast.com>... > When the idiots and their idiotic claims And you complain about Mike not being civil? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Shogoki Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2002 00:26:57 -0500 Subject: Re: And Now For Something Completely Different Message-ID: <2u37ru4e85cder7cmv1ccuv9m8e2435eiv@4ax.com> -------- "Time worthy" responses: >> That is Incorrect. >> > > That is Incorrect. >> >> That is False. >> >> That is not true at all. >> >> That is Incorrect. >> >> That is False >> >> That is Incorrect. >> >> That is a Lie. >> >> That is Incorrect. >> >